It's a bit late to link to this, but never mind. The NYT stands revealed as an agent of self-destruction and a cheery purveyor of illogic and untruth. Saddam was a year away from nuclear weapons in 2002 but nevertheless the whole basis for invading Iraq was false.
Just exactly how stupid are their readers? I don't mention the readers of the Indescribablependent because the whole nature/nurture issue comes into play. Were they born stupid or did reading it make them that way? My inclination is to suspect the latter.